Hubbard v. Dusy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Action of ejectment tried by a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The determination of the issue depended solely upon the true location of a line of the government survey between townships 14 and 15 south, Mount Diablo base and meridian, it being admitted that the plaintiff owned the demanded premises described in his complaint as the south half of the southeast quarter of section 31, township 14 south, range 22 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, lying immediately north of and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Washington Rock Co. v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1905
- Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stangair v. RoadsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. MountsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.