Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Lord
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 2004No. 73853-0PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.
Stephen J. Lord petitioned for review of an order of the chief judge of Division Two of the Court of Appeals dismissing his timely personal restraint petition (PRP). He principally asserts that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement when she failed to recommend that he receive a partially suspended sentence conditioned on a Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA). We granted review and now hold that the prosecutor breached *185the plea agreement by refusing to recommend to the sentencing court that Lord receive a partially suspended sentence conditioned on a SSOSA.
STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. SandovalWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of MulhollandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SandovalWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.