Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Grantham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2010No. 82194-1PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 James Grantham, an inmate, was disciplined for attempting to smuggle tobacco and marijuana into the McNeil Island Corrections Center. He challenges the disciplinary process and the sufficiency of the evidence against him. We take this opportunity to clarify the approach courts must take in such cases and hold that a petitioner seeking relief in a personal restraint petition from prison discipline is not required to make a prima facie showing of prejudice, since no opportunity for judicial review is otherwise available. However, the burden is on the petitioner to show that the disciplinary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CraceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. SandovalWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SandovalWashington Supreme Court · 2011

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API