State v. Sandoval
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 The question presented is whether, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky,_U.S._, 130 S. Ct. 1473,176 L. Ed. 2d 284 (2010), a noncitizen criminal defendant can be denied the right to effective assistance of counsel when the defense *167attorney erroneously assures the defendant that the deportation consequence of a guilty plea can be mitigated.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Valentin Sandoval, a noncitizen permanent resident of the United States, was charged with rape in the second degree. The prosecutor offered, in exchange for a guilty plea, to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CraceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. OrocioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.