Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Mulholland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2007No. 79150-3PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 A Pierce County jury found Daniel Mulholland guilty of six counts of first degree assault and *325one count of drive-by shooting. The jury also determined that Mulholland was armed with a firearm during each of the assaults. The trial court thereafter ordered Mulhol-land’s first degree assault sentences to be served consecutively, concluding that it was without discretion to impose concurrent sentences for separate serious violent offenses. Mulholland later filed a personal restraint petition (PRP) with the Court of Appeals. That court granted the petition, determining that the “trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. GraysonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Matter of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re Pers. Restraint of Light-RothWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2016

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API