In re the Personal Restraint of Mulholland
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 A Pierce County jury found Daniel Mulholland guilty of six counts of first degree assault and *325one count of drive-by shooting. The jury also determined that Mulholland was armed with a firearm during each of the assaults. The trial court thereafter ordered Mulhol-land’s first degree assault sentences to be served consecutively, concluding that it was without discretion to impose concurrent sentences for separate serious violent offenses. Mulholland later filed a personal restraint petition (PRP) with the Court of Appeals. That court granted the petition, determining that the “trial court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GraysonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Personal Restraint of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Pers. Restraint of Light-RothWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.