Legal Opinion

David W. Erickson, Doing Business as Erickson Hair and Scalp Specialists v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 19, 1959No. 12635_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission requiring petitioner, David W. Erickson, doing business as Erickson Hair and Scalp Specialists, to cease and desist from falsely advertising petitioner’s medicinal and cosmetic preparations in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 et seq.

The Commission’s complaint charged petitioner (respondent below) with dis seminating, through the United States mails and by various means in interstate commerce, false advertisements concerning his preparations, all to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. KaadtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Niresk Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Bernice Stone Kahn, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API