Legal Opinion
Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1960No. 16699PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
Before us is a petition to review 1 an order of the Federal Trade Commission, to be referred to as “Commission” or “respondent”, dated October 2, 1959, ordering Maurice J. Feil and Leo A. Loeb, individually and as co-partners trading as the Enurtone Company, to be referred to as “petitioners”, to
“forthwith cease and desist from representing directly or indirectly:
“That the use of said device is of valúe in stopping bed-wetting or correcting the bed-wetting habit, unless expressly limited in a clear and conspicuous manner to cases of bed-wetting not involving organic…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Beneficial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Beneficial Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.