Legal Opinion

Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 7, 1973No. 71-1479PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

The central ruling in this case holds that private actions to vindicate rights asserted under the Federal Trade Commission Act may not be maintained.

Claiming to represent the interests of the consuming public and advertising audience, 1 the appellants brought this class action against Bristol-Myers Corporation, the manufacturer of Excedrin, a widely sold non-prescription analgesic compound. They allege in essence that Bristol-Myers’ representations in a variety of advertisements — that Excedrin is and has been shown to be a more effective pain relieving agent than…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Diane Jeter v. Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API