Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Quality Oil Company of Statesville, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1966No. 451PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Branch J.

The decisive question on this appeal is whether the court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for nonsuit.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not invoked by plaintiff, nor is it available. The attic furnace, the underground tanks, filler pipes, and the entire store building were under the control of the plaintiff. The doctrine does not apply when the instrumentalities causing the injury are not under the exclusive control or management of the defendant. Nor does the doctrine apply “where more than one inference can be drawn from the evidence as to the cause of the injury, (or) .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Patrick v. . TreadwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Moore v. Beard-Laney, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. STARRETT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  3. O'QUINN v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API