Legal Opinion

State v. Duvall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1981No. 801SC821PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant brings forward twenty-three assignments of error. For organizational purposes in this opinion, those arguments which we feel merit discussion will be grouped into subdivisions.

We note at the outset that in order to convict defendant of being an accessory after the fact under N.C.G.S. 14-7, the state must prove the following: (1) the felony has been committed by the principal; (2) the alleged accessory gave personal assistance to that principal to aid in his escaping detection, arrest, or punishment; and (3) the alleged accessory knew the principal committed…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DuvallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. FieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. CousinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API