Legal Opinion

Dybata v. Kistler

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1985No. Docket 74365PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Tahvonen, J.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff challenges an order of the trial court barring the proposed testimony of her expert witness as to the claim made against defendant, Ole Kistler. We affirm.

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that on September 4, 1979, she consulted Dr. Kistler, a doctor of osteopathy in general practice, because of uterine bleeding, discharge and pain. Dr. Kistler allegedly diagnosed functional uterine bleeding and treated accordingly. On September 11, 1979, Dr. Kistler referred plaintiff to Dr. David Prigg, a doctor of osteopathy specializing in obstetrics and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dora v. LesinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Swanek v. Hutzel HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Gilmore v. O'SULLIVANMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Thomson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. RichmondMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Reddam v. Consumer Mortgage Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Pettis v. Nalco Chemical Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API