Legal Opinion
Howard University v. Green
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1994No. 93-CV-18PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
In this civil action for retaliatory termination of employment, appellant Howard University Hospital (“Howard University” or “Hospital”), the former employer of appellee LuEthel Tate Green (“Green”), seeks reversal of a judgment in favor of Green, or in the alternative, a new trial. Howard University contends the trial judge erred in denying its post' trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“JNOV”) because Green failed to make out a prima facie ease for retaliation under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”). Alternatively, Howard University…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Arthur Manoharan, M.D. v. Columbia University College of Physicians & SurgeonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Linda Love v. Re/max of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Carney, Darion M. v. Amer UnivCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gaujacq v. EDF, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- McFadden v. BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.