Legal Opinion
Linda Love v. Re/max of America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1984No. 82-1576PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Linda Love brought this action against RE/MAX of America, Inc. (RE/MAX) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982) (Title VII), and 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1982) (Fair Labor Standards Act) as modified by 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (1982) (Equal Pay Act). Love alleged that RE/MAX violated Title VII by discriminating against her on the basis of sex, violated the Equal Pay Act by failing to give her equal pay for equal work, and retaliated against her in violation of both Title VII and the Fair Labor Standards Act. After a trial to the bench, the judge rendered an oral decision…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Arthur Manoharan, M.D. v. Columbia University College of Physicians & SurgeonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Conner v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.