Legal Opinion
Paul v. Howard University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 2000No. 96-CV-483PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Dr. Alakananda Paul, filed a nine-count complaint 1 against Howard University, her former employer, and several of its administrators 2 after she failed to receive a tenured position at the University. Her complaint alleged breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, interference with contractual relations and prospective advantage, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of an implied-in-fact employment contract, conspiracy, and retaliation and discrimination under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Stephanie Brown v. Allen SessomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Caroline Herron v. Fannie MaeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Almy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Futrell v. Department of Labor Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.