Legal Opinion

State v. Wingard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 306A85PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant argues eleven assignments of error on this appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to compel disclosure of the theory upon which the State sought to convict him, to disclose criminal records of the State’s witnesses, to prohibit death qualification of the jury, and to allow individual voir dire and sequestration of prospective jurors. Defendant further alleges that the trial court erred in allowing notes to be read into evidence; testimony as to the meaning of “rollers”; testimony concerning a statement made by an eyewitness to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API