Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. McCree

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 5, 1986No. 84-1865PublishedCited by 1,561 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

In this case we address the question left open by our decision nearly 18 years ago in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510 (1968): Does the Constitution prohibit the removal for cause, prior to the guilt phase of a bifurcated capital trial, of prospective jurors whose opposition to the death penalty is so strong that it would prevent or substantially impair the performance of their duties as jurors at the sentencing phase of the trial? See id., at 520, n. 18; Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U. S. 543, 545 (1968). We hold that it does not.

Respondent Ardia McCree filed a habeas corpus petition…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,561 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Franklin v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

1,556 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API