Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1992No. 91-1774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The narrow issue presented by appellees’ motions to dismiss is whether the commission’s July 18, 1991 order, as affirmed by its August 15, 1991 entry on rehearing, is final and appealable. We hold that it is not.

R.C. 4903.13 provides in part:

“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”

R.C. 2505.02 defines a “final order” as:

“An order that affects a substantial right in an action which in effect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall China Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Senior Citizens Coalition v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Ashtabula v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API