City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Weygandt^ C. J.
Sections 504-2 and 504-3, General Code, read 4n part as follows:
Section 504-2: “No railroad as defined in Section 501 of the General Code, operating any railroad in the state of Ohio, and no public utility as defined in Section 614-2» of the General Code furnishing service or facilities within the state of Ohio, shall abandon or be required to abandon or withdraw any main track or tracks or depot of a railroad or main pipe line, gas line, telegraph line or telephone toll line, electric light line, water line or steam pipe line, or any portion thereof, pumping station,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Pittsburgh & West Virginia Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- State of Ohio, on the Relation of Paul T. Klapp, Prosecuting Attorney v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.