Legal Opinion

City of Ashtabula v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1942No. 28763PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The jurisdiction of this court to hear an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission is based upon Section 544, General Code, which is as follows:

“A final order made by the commission shall be reversed, vacated or modified by the Supreme Court on appeal, if upon consideration of the record such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”

The question raised by the motion to dismiss the ap peal of the eity to this court is whether the order of the commission overruling the motion of the city to dismiss the proceedings before it, is a “final order.” It is conceded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re Adoption of Y.E.F. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In re Adoption of Y.E.F. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API