Legal Opinion

Hanchett v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Shiawassee; Collins (Joseph H.), J. Assumpsit by Arthur J. Hanchett against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, surety, and Arthur' L. Waldorf, principal, on a bond. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant surety brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

In May, 1917, plaintiff made a contract with the board of county road commissioners for the construction of a section of highway for the sum of $16,500. Later plaintiff sublet to Mr. Waldorf the work of graveling said road for the sum of $12,400. Mr. Waldorf furnished a bond to the principal contractor with the Fidelity & Casualty Company as surety thereon. The bond contained the following:

“Legal proceedings for recovery hereunder may not be brought unless begun within twelve months from the time of the discovery of the act or omission of the principal on account of which claim is made. But…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lyon v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kavanagh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API