Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Ulrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1975No. Civ. 37152PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Harold Rogers appeals from a judgment fcr the defense, rendered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8, in this action for damages for recordation of a telephone conversation. Appellant sought damages from the City of San Jose and from Robert Ulrich because Ulrich, a city employee, had tape recorded, and allowed other persons to hear, portions of a telephone conversation betwéen Rogers and Ulrich. In appellant’s first cause of action it was alleged that Ulrich had wrongfully recorded and disseminated the conversation, causing general damages in the amount of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Permalab-Metalab Equipment Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Warden v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. In Re AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Arthur L. Sachs, Inc. v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Friddle v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API