Friddle v. Epstein
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, Acting P. J.
This controversy between a real estate broker and his clients presents the following issues: (1) With respect to a contract arranged by their broker, can the clients ratify less than the whole of the contract? (2) Is the Invasion of Privacy Act (Pen. Code, §§ 630-637.6) 1 violated if a surreptitious recording of a confidential communication is not published to a third person? (3) Is a civil litigant who establishes a violation of the Invasion of Privacy Act entitled to recover a mandatory minimum award of $3,000 without regard to any actual damagess suffered? We hold…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Warden v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Romero v. Securus Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Kight v. Cashcall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Coulter v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Marich v. MGM/UA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.