Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Arias

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1986No. Crim. 24307PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Does the installation of bugging equipment in the chapel complex of a Youth Authority facility violate the religious freedom or privacy rights of Youth Authority wards?

I

Petitioner Arias was a ward of the Youth Authority (YA) at the Karl Holton School, Northern California Youth Center.1 From time to time, petitioner participated in religious services held in the Protestant chapel. These services include: (1) worship, (2) music and art, (3) bible studies, (4) prayers and auricular confessions, (5) individual spiritual counselling, and (6) group counselling. Some of these…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Vernon v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Vernon v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API