Legal Opinion

In re Yon Rast

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 22, 1990No. 23145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLIC REPRIMAND

2Per curiam

A Complaint was filed in this attorney grievance action alleging that Rast was guilty of commingling client, office and personal funds, failing to pay client funds in a timely manner and failing to properly maintain client funds in violation of D.R. 9-102 of the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. These allegations resulted from two separate incidents. Rast did not file an Answer and therefore the charges against him are deemed admitted under Paragraph 13c of the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. He did, however, request a hearing in mitigation.

The Panel Hearing was held on…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API