Legal Opinion

Petaluma Paving Co. v. Singley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1902No. S.F. No. 2055PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the court below, but on motion of the defendants a new trial was granted, from which order the plaintiff appeals. The suit was brought to enforce the lien of a street assessment. The complaint is in the ordinary form, setting forth the several acts of the municipal authorities required by the law; and on the trial all its allegations were admitted except the following,—corresponding respectively to the eighth, eighteenth, and twenty-ninth findings of the court:—

“Section seven . . . : ‘That before passing the resolution for the construction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. MatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Bode v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fanning v. LevistonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hall v. SusskindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Caldwell v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API