Petaluma Paving Co. v. Singley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the court below, but on motion of the defendants a new trial was granted, from which order the plaintiff appeals. The suit was brought to enforce the lien of a street assessment. The complaint is in the ordinary form, setting forth the several acts of the municipal authorities required by the law; and on the trial all its allegations were admitted except the following,—corresponding respectively to the eighth, eighteenth, and twenty-ninth findings of the court:—
“Section seven . . . : ‘That before passing the resolution for the construction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. MatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Bode v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fanning v. LevistonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hall v. SusskindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Caldwell v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.