Fanning v. Leviston
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action on an assessment for street-work in the city and county of San Francisco, done under the act of April 1, 1872.
Appellant relies for a reversal upon three grounds: 1. That there was no recommendation by the street superintendent, and therefore no jurisdiction in the board of supervisors to order the work done; 2. That the contractor did not grade the street to the official grade; 3. That the assessment and demand included a charge for work not authorized to be done.
It cannot be said there was no evidence that the work had been recommended by the superintendent of streets.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Shepard v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Perine v. ForbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Golden Gate Lumber Co. v. SahrbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.