Davis v. Davis
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Plaintiff, not having appealed, is conclusively presumed to be satisfied with the decree. In disposing of the case we cannot render a decree any more favorable to plaintiff than the decree appealed from by the defendant: Crumbley v. Crumbley, 94 Or. 617 (186 Pac. 423).
It has been determined so often that the Circuit Court is without power to award to the innocent party in a divorce case the specific property of the defendant, either real or personal, that it should be considered the settled law of the state. It is unnecessary to discuss the principle involved and we content ourselves with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huffman v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Schafer v. SchaferOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Rufenach v. RufenachMontana Supreme Court · 1947
- Coston v. Portland Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- In re the Marriage of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.