Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. C90-2246DR; CA A75155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Husband petitions for reconsideration of our opinion. 121 Or App 635, 856 P2d 325 (1993). We allow the petition, modify our opinion and affirm.

We address only husband’s argument that we erred when we recalculated husband’s inheritance and increased the amount of wife’s judgment, given that wife did not challenge the trial court’s judgment by a cross-appeal. Hofer v. Hofer, 244 Or 88, 92, 415 P2d 753 (1966); Davis v. Davis, 123 Or 667, 669, 263 P 914 (1928). Wife responds that she is not attacking the trial court’s decision:

“The trial judge awarded wife one-third of husband’s inheritances.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Snyder v. Amermann, Jr.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Davis v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In re the Marriage of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API