Legal Opinion

Crumbley v. Crumbley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1920PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. Department 1. • Suit by Mary C. Crumbley against J. S. Crumbley. From a portion of the decree rendered, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is a divorce ease. The parties were married January 7, 1891. They have three sons well above the age of majority and a fourth son said to be fourteen years old. Two daughters, one twelve and the other eight years of age, complete the family. The plaintiff accuses the defendant of cruel and inhuman treatment rendering her life burdensome. The specifications range from the application to her of opprobrious epithets impugning her chastity, through uncouth table manners, to his burning the late periodicals. A conspicuous feature of the complaint is a long list of the defendant’s real…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landram v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Shook v. ColohanOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Thorton v. KrimbellOregon Supreme Court · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garner v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Johnson v. PrinevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Abrams v. RushlightOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. White v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API