Bates v. Niles & Watters Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.
The pleadings and discussions between the court and counsel as to what was actually in controversy cover thirty-four (34) pages of the abstract, and we have been to considerable labor to get to the kernel of this litigation. If we have correctly apprehended, this appeal presents but two .questions, though these have been amplified in argument to a number of divisions. The case of Bates v. Remley, 223 Iowa 654, 273 N. W. 180, deals in a large measure with the same facts as enter into the discussion here, and the statement there made by Stiger, J. makes it unnecessary that we go over them again.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bates v. RemleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- In Re Estate of ScholbrockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Andrew v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Bates v. Oxford Junction Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- In Re Receivership City-Com. Sav. BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hise v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Rohrig v. WhitneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.