Legal Opinion

Evans v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1939No. S. F. 16245; S. F. 16268Published

1Opinion of the Court

14 Cal.2d 563 (1939)

RALPH EVANS, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc., Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 16245.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 9, 1939.

Wood, Crump & Rogers, Cushing & Cushing and Bartley C. Crum for Petitioner.

Everett C. McKeage and Richard M. Leonard, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Petitioner.

Walter H. Linforth and William M. Cannon for Respondents in S. F. No. 16245. Sullivan, Roche & Johnson, Orrick, Dahlquist, Neff & Herrington and Linforth, Cannon & Miller for Respondents in S. F. No. 16268.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API