Legal Opinion

Andrew v. First Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 41553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was affirmed by operation of law on June 24, 1932, because of an equally divided court. A petition for rehearing was filed, and we are asked to give our opinion as to the legal right of the Superintendent of Banking of the state of Iowa, as receiver of such corporations, .to make application to borrow money from the Reconstruction Finance Corpora tion, and the power of the court to which such application is made, to grant such right and privilege.

The receiver we have to deal with in cases of this character is a statutory receiver, and not a general chancery receiver, and his rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. In Re Cashmere State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bates v. Niles & Watters Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Attorney General v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rand v. Merrimack River Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API