Lucasey Manufacturing Corp. v. Anchor Pad International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiff Lucasey Manufacturing Corporation sues defendant Anchor Pad International for declaratory relief that plaintiff’s office equipment security devices do not infringe defendant’s U.S. Patent No. 3,850,-392 (the “ ’392” patent). 1 Defendant has cross-claimed for a determination that the ’392 patent is valid and infringed by plaintiff’s product. Plaintiff has also alleged that defendant’s threats of litigation against and communications with plaintiff’s distributors and customers constitutes unfair competition.
Plaintiff now seeks a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Goldie's Bookstore, Inc. v. The Superior Court Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Cassim v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Mirror Polishing & Plating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Laughlin Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- American Cyanamid Co. v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Hart Enterprises, Inc. v. ChiaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- On Command Video Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991