Legal Opinion

Hart Enterprises, Inc. v. Chia

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 29, 1992No. Civ. 92-347-FRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

The matter before the court is the motion of defendants, Francis Chia, Childbro Toys Ltd., Easebon Services Ltd., Joe Lingg, and Harry Moorhouse (hereinafter, Childbro), for a temporary restraining order (#7-1) and a preliminary injunction as to plaintiff’s misleading and threatening communications to the trade (#7-2).

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Hart Enterprises, Inc. (Hart), of Vancouver, Washington and defendant Childbro Toys Ltd. and its related parties of Hong Kong (Childbro) are competitors who manufacture and market novelty vibrating pens. Hart markets its pens…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Donald P. Hodel, and Alaska Miners Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Lucasey Manufacturing Corp. v. Anchor Pad International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API