Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. United States Surgical Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 30, 1992No. Civ. 5:91CV-352(FBB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
This infringement action involves United States Patent No. 4,135,622 (“the ’622 patent”), entitled “Packaged, Desiccated Surgical Elements,” which was issued on January 23, 1979 to American Cyanamid Company (“Cyanamid”) as assignee of the inventor, Arthur Glick. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), and venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
Cyanamid has moved for an order enjoining United States Surgical Corporation (“U.S. Surgical”) pendente lite from making, using,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaplan v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, CORP. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008