Legal Opinion

McAlister v. Methodist Hospital of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1977PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The sole issue in this hospital malpractice action is whether a hospital employee, covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, who suffers an injury arising out of and in the course of her employment, may bring a common law action against the hospital for negligent treatment. The trial judge responded in the negative, holding that the Workmen’s Compensation Act provided the exclusive remedy. This action is before this Court on interlocutory appeal, the trial judge having certified the above issue as a controlling question of law, pursuant to Sec. 27-305, T.C.A.

I

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bernardo Balancio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Transports, Inc. v. PerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Revell v. McCaughanTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bouley v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Deller v. NaymickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API