Legal Opinion

Revell v. McCaughan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1931PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a suit for damages for injuries on account of alleged malpractice of a physician. The defendant pleaded a settlement for said injuries, under the compensation statute, by the employer in whose service plaintiff was engaged at the time the injuries were received. This plea was held good, the suit dismissed, and the plaintiff appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. On November 29, 3929, while in the employ of one Lanning as a carpenter, plaintiff met with an accident and the defendant herein, a physician, was engaged by Lanning to treat plaintiff’s injuries, and did so. On April 1, 1930,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Rice v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. SaxbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. McAlister v. Methodist Hospital of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Transports, Inc. v. PerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Anderson v. Westfield GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Banks v. Elks Club Pride of Tennessee 1102Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API