Legal Opinion

Bouley v. City of Norwich

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 1992No. 14356PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether an employee who is injured in an automobile accident while operating his employer’s vehicle during the course of his employment is precluded by General Statutes § 31-284 (a)1 from collecting uninsured motor*746ist benefits2 from his self-insured employer. The plaintiff, Bruce A. Bouley,3 was injured when the police vehicle he was operating collided with another vehicle. After exhausting the third party tortfeasor’s automobile liability coverage, the plaintiff, who had also received workers’ compensation benefits, brought an action for uninsured…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Berger v. H.P. Hood, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API