Legal Opinion

Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 2001No. C8-00-1773PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERTRAND PORITSKY, Judge *

Following the district court’s grant of summary judgment in its favor, appellant insured contends that the district court erred in limiting its recovery of damages and attorney fees to $8,866.58. Respondent insurance company filed a notice of review challenging the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insured. Because the insurer breached its duty to defend and indemnify the insured, and the district court’s award of costs and attorney fees was proper, we affirm in part. Nonetheless, we remand for a factual finding as to whether the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
  2. Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Westfield Insurance Co. v. KroissCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Jarvis & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API