Legal Opinion

Westfield Insurance Co. v. Kroiss

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 2005No. A04-1330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant insurer challenges the district court’s finding that it had a duty to defend respondents homebuilders against lawsuits for water damages allegedly caused by defective construction. Respondents contend that the district court erred by not allowing them to recover attorney fees in the declaratory judgment action to determine appellant’s duty to defend. Because we conclude that appellant breached its duty to defend, we affirm in part. Because we conclude respondents’ attorney fees from the declaratory judgment action are damages arising from that breach, we reverse…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pine Oak Builders, Inc. v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Ortega-Maldonado v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. The Continental Insurance Co. v. Daikin Applied Americas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Bergen v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API