Jarvis & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERS
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant International Marine Underwriters (IMU) seeks review of a judgment declaring that its policy provided liability-insurance coverage for personal injuries suffered from a fall on a boat. IMU challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insured, respondent Jarvis & Sons, Inc. (Jarvis), arguing that the district court erred in holding that IMU has a duty to defend and indemnify Jarvis in the underlying personal-injury suit. Because we conclude that the district court correctly interpreted the insurance policy to provide coverage, we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Leon v. GalceranSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- BDG International, Inc. v. BowersColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Petters Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Great West Casualty Company v. Pamela RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016