Legal Opinion

Jarvis & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERS

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 2009No. A08-1402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant International Marine Underwriters (IMU) seeks review of a judgment declaring that its policy provided liability-insurance coverage for personal injuries suffered from a fall on a boat. IMU challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insured, respondent Jarvis & Sons, Inc. (Jarvis), arguing that the district court erred in holding that IMU has a duty to defend and indemnify Jarvis in the underlying personal-injury suit. Because we conclude that the district court correctly interpreted the insurance policy to provide coverage, we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Leon v. GalceranSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. BDG International, Inc. v. BowersColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In Re Petters Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  4. Great West Casualty Company v. Pamela RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API