Legal Opinion

In Re Toney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 17, 2012No. 27087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, Respondent Ivan James Toney was accused of misconduct in twenty-three separate complaints. Following a hearing, a panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Panel) recommended Respondent receive a definite three-month suspension, along with certain other requirements. Given the pattern of Respondent’s misconduct and the multitude of complaints at issue, we impose a definite suspension from the practice of law for a period of nine months from the date of this opinion. Further, we adopt all other sanctions recommended by the Panel.

I

These disciplinary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. In Re BraghirolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re SturkeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re CabanissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Paul Winford Owen, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. In re Jones-BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. In re ToneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In the Matter of David F. StoddardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026
  5. In the Matter of Paul W. OwenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API