Legal Opinion

In re Toney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2012-212055; No. 2012-212055Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On January 17, 2012, the Court suspended petitioner from the practice of law for nine (9) months and ordered he pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings within sixty (60) days. In the Matter of Toney, 396 S.C. 303, 721 S.E.2d 437 (2012). In addition to other requirements, the Court ordered petitioner to complete twelve (12) months of mentoring “in accordance with the Panel’s” after reinstatement.1

Pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, of Rule 413, SCACR, petitioner filed a Petition for Reinstatement seeking reinstatement to the practice of law. The matter was referred to the Committee on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re ToneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API