Legal Opinion
In re Murawinski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 11, 1986, as Walter A. Murawinski, Jr. Although respondent apparently no longer maintains a law office within this Judicial Department, this Court has jurisdiction over respondent inasmuch as for all times relevant to the underlying misconduct his last known business address, as well as another address given by him to the complainant in this matter, are both located in the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order pursuant…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re PieriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re SchulzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re ReisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
4Cited by13 opinions
- In re SpieglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re StanchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re AnyikwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re AnyikwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.