Legal Opinion
In re Spiegler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 3, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Barry I. Spiegler was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 9,1973. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
In August 2005, a complaint was filed with the Committee by Jeanette Sackett who, as executrix, hired respondent to represent her stepmother’s estate. Ms. Sackett alleged that respondent was, among other things, unresponsive to her efforts to contact him and had in his possession $27,000 of…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re PieriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re MurawinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4Cited by13 opinions
- In re HolubarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re MillstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In Re WarburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- In re BenzingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.