Legal Opinion
In re Pierini
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 2005PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*43OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on May 5, 1976. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law until further order of the Court due to his failure to cooperate with the Committee’s investigation into allegations of professional misconduct, which immediately…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re HoroshkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re KamgarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4Cited by24 opinions
- In re MurawinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re SpieglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re MillstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re AmukeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.