Legal Opinion

In re Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Mercedes Medina was admitted to the practice of *251law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on May 20, 1998. Although the Committee believes she no longer maintains a law office within New York State, this Court maintains jurisdiction over respondent based on acts of misconduct committed within the First Department during all times in question.

By an unpublished, corrected order entered May 4, 2006 (M-1606), this Court granted the Committee’s motion to permit service of its notice of motion to suspend upon respondent by publication in the New…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re PieriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re MurawinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SnortelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re SnortelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API