Legal Opinion
Ordaz v. Tate CA5
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 2020No. F078328Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 12/4/20 Ordaz v. Tate CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RAFAEL ORDAZ, F078328 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-17-100270) v. HAROLD TATE, M.D., et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents. THE…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.