Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Renkiewicz Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1964No. Calendar 8, Docket 50,275PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.

Defendant appeals from decree declaring that plaintiff has title by adverse possession to a strip of defendant’s land encroached on by plaintiff’s building and an easement by prescription in a sidewalk on defendant’s land. Plaintiff’s 1960 bill of complaint had sought vesting in himself of a fee simple title in a larger strip of land which included both of above parcels; the amended bill of complaint prayed for the same, or, in the alternative, a prescriptive easement in the sidewalk.

Plaintiff William C. Siegel became vested with fee simple title to lots 361 and 362 of Goodrich & Burton’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stewart v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Renwick v. NoggleMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Jackson v. DeemarMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ketchel v. KetchelMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mumrow v. RiddleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Killips v. MannistoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Rutland v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Matthews v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Connelly v. BuckinghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API