Connelly v. Buckingham
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWahls, P.J.
This case presents a classic boundary line dispute, the law of which is seldom reviewed today except by students of rudimentary property law. The plaintiff filed a complaint to quiet title to a disputed stretch of land, an area of approximately 627 square feet. As depicted in the diagram at the end of this opinion, the disputed property is triangular in shape. It lies to the northeast of the plaintiffs property, and to the southwest corner of the tract of land owned by the defendants James and Barbara Buckingham. The Clinton River bounds all of the property of the parties to the northwest.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gorte v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wengel v. WengelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Killips v. MannistoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- McQueen v. BlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- DeGroot v. BarberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.